plasmate status?

[Martin Gräßlin]

On Monday 18 October 2010 18:57:59 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Monday 18 October 2010, Chani wrote:
> > On October 18, 2010 18:26:47 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > On Monday, October 18, 2010, Chani wrote:
> > > > On October 18, 2010 17:19:53 Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> > > > > On Monday, October 18, 2010, Chani wrote:
> > > > > > to demo plasmate - but when I tried to compile it it wanted
> > > > > > qgpgme, and I
> > > > > 
> > > > > qgpgme is in kdepimlibs.
> > > > 
> > > > ah, I don't have that and don't intend to.
> > > 
> > > given that things in kdepimlibs are fairly widely used and that it
> > > isn't all that big, i'd recommend installing it, tbh.
> > 
> > wouldn't it upset kdepim 4.4?
> > given the changes in kdepim 4.5 I'd rather play it safe :) I'm probably
> > lucky that kdepim and kdelibs still get along all right (ish).
> 
> i'm using kdepim 4.4 with pimlibs trunk since a while, probably isn't a
> wise thing to do, but seems to work decently so far
works pretty well here too for ever since I switched to 4.5. It's also what 
Kubuntu does for example in 10.10: kdepim 4.4 with kdepimlibs 4.5
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 316 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20101018/6f8219c9/attachment.sig