4.5 - Activities

[Marco Martin]

On Wednesday 10 March 2010, Aaron J. Seigo wrote:
> On March 9, 2010, Chani wrote:
> > well yeah, but then when the screen is disconnected you can't get at the
> > containment(s) that were on it until you reconnect a screen.
> > or do you think that's just not important?
> 
> i can imagine use cases where it's important, but it's something we can
> address later easily enough.
> 
> or maybe we could get it nearly "for free" when we get around to stashing
> containments that are associated with a screen that doesn't currently
> exist; we could show these other containments as part of the activity that
> can be switched between, perhaps via a popup or other "slide out" in the
> activity switcher.
> 
> but yes, there is a lot of groundwork that needs to be done first before we
> get to this chasm-in-need-of-a-bridge and i don't see anything that would
> create a blocker to building that bridge when we need to.
i like the concept of auto stashing containments of screens that got 
disconnected

Cheers,
Marco Martin