Review Request: add Applet::init() in Containment::init()

[Aaron Seigo]

> On 2010-02-23 15:12:20, Aaron Seigo wrote:
> > /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/plasma/containment.cpp, lines 150-153
> > <http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3041/diff/1/?file=19854#file19854line150>
> >
> >     Applet::init() should definitely be called in the if (!isContainment()) block, but Applet::init() does various things that aren't appropriate for Containment.
> >     
> >     the only useful part in Applet::init() would be the package object creation. i'd suggest taking that part out of Applet::init(), moving it to a method in AppletPrivate and then calling it from both Applet::init() as well as Containment::init().
> 
> Richard Dale wrote:
>     I think the above suggestion makes sense, but looking at the code in Applet::init() it doesn't appear to do anything other than what we need:
>     
>     void Applet::init()
>     {
>         if (d->script) {
>             d->setupScriptSupport();
>     
>             if (!d->script->init() && !d->failed) {
>                 setFailedToLaunch(true, i18n("Script initialization failed"));
>             }
>         }
>     }
>     
>     So to me it looks like all of Applet::init() should be moved to an AppletPrivate method.

erf; sorry, i looked at the wrong init() method. i looked at AppletPrivate::init() ... :/ sorry. so, yes... this patch as provided is correct.


- Aaron


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3041/#review4252
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2010-02-23 12:46:46, Vincenzo Di Massa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3041/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2010-02-23 12:46:46)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Can this be harmful? I think this could be useful in order to allow scripted containments. But I must confess I don't understand how the whole thing works, so maybe there is a reason why this one liner is not already in plasma :-)
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 227767.
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=227767
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/KDE/kdelibs/plasma/containment.cpp 1092102 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/3041/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I'm using this patch on my work machine... I can not spot any problem and I was able to make scripted containments sort of work.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vincenzo
> 
>