Declarative UI Integration, reprise
chanika at gmail.com
Thu Sep 24 19:24:31 CEST 2009
On September 24, 2009 05:07:31 Marco Martin wrote:
> On Thursday 24 September 2009, Alan Alpert wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:38:16 ext Marco Martin wrote:
> > > On Thursday 24 September 2009, Alan Alpert wrote:
> > > ...
> > >
> > > i'm compiling the branch right now, then i'll be able to give more in
> > > depth look.
> > >
> > > just quickly looking at it 2 things comes to my mind:
> > > -in the qml the word Plasmoid is used for the main applet. technically
> > > it indicates more the packages of scripted plasmoids that can contain
> > > the code, the desktop file, the graphics etc.. could even make sense
> > > there but maybe PlasmaApplet would be more correct?
> > Could be. I had the feeling though that we didn't want to use the word
> > 'Applet' outside of code. The issue here is whether QML files are code -
> > I like to think of them as less code like and fully accessible to
> > non-coders (and I'm probably being overly optimistic). If we view QML at
> > the same level as the other scripting languages though then I agree with
> > you.
> yeah, good question, let's wait other opinions on that ;)
the simple js bindings use "plasmoid". :)
This message brought to you by eevil bananas and the number 3.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20090924/5c58b12a/attachment.sig
More information about the Plasma-devel