MediaCenterComponents - Picasa Engine

[Sebastian Kügler]

On Monday 14 September 2009 15:06:35 Alessandro Diaferia wrote:
> That's great! Do we want to keep the "API" on the DataEngine's query side
>  or do we want to provide a set of inherited DataEngines such as for
>  example Plasma::MediaContentsDataEngine ? But probably that's too much.

On the one hand, it would make sense to share some common code, on the other hand, 
having an abstract mediacontent engine might not be what we want (since DataEngine is 
already abstract enough and should work fine). I suspect that this is something we'll 
find out as we have code for more than one or two engines. That should give us a  
better feeling for how much abstraction makes sense here.

Cheers,
-- 
sebas

http://www.kde.org | http://vizZzion.org | GPG Key ID: 9119 0EF9
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 489 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20090914/ae1824da/attachment.sig