Review Request: Draft: Widgets Explorer "Add Widgets"

[Anselmo Melo]

> On 2009-11-17 09:01:45, Marco Martin wrote:
> > ths is absolutely needed, to not face a dig regression in 4.4... can't really try the patch right now, can you provide a screenshot of it?

Sorry about the dalay =/The screenshots show the button and the menu added.


- Anselmo


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2191/#review3141
-----------------------------------------------------------


On 2009-11-17 05:41:34, Anselmo Melo wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2191/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated 2009-11-17 05:41:34)
> 
> 
> Review request for Plasma.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> "Add widgets" button in the new widgets explorer. There are points that need to be defined, such as the button position / strings in the interface. In this draft, a toolbutton and a kmenu are used like in the old explorer (Variable names changed because IMHO the old ones weren't clear).
> A known issue in the interface is the menu position: Although corona->popupPosition returns a reasonable point, the menu appears on the top of the screen - probably, my fault.
> 
> Suggestions and comments are welcome =)
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 211576.
>     https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211576
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   /trunk/KDE/kdebase/workspace/libs/plasmagenericshell/widgetsExplorer/widgetexplorer.cpp 1049196 
> 
> Diff: http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2191/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Adding widgets from GHNS works, Google Gadgets are installed but the widget list isn't updated correctly. "From file" needs more tests.
> 
> 
> Screenshots
> -----------
> 
> Ger New Widgets button
>   http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2191/s/267/
> Menu
>   http://reviewboard.kde.org/r/2191/s/268/
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Anselmo
> 
>