discrepancy in python bindings for plasma

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Thursday 19 February 2009, Benjamin Kleiner wrote:
>   I have played around with the python bindings for plasma, and I noticed
> that the config dialog can't be "hijacked",

so my question to you is, why do you want to do this?

> since
> plasmascript.Applet.createConfigurationInterface() won't get called, thou
> you can use showConfiguration to completely override it. Is it supposed to
> be this way, and if yes, why?

yes, it is supposed to be this way. of course, it is up to the script engine 
itself. it can provide a way to "hijack" the config dialog, but in the case of 
native plasma widgets that's highly discouraged.

... which brings us back to the first question ;)

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20090219/912fac65/attachment.sig