Systemtray benchmarks

[Aaron J. Seigo]

On Tuesday 31 March 2009, Dario Freddi wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Just my 2 cents here.
>
> If the uncompressed raw data works and it's not an unmaintainable beast,
> I'd go for it for the simple fact that having to
> compress->transmit->decompress could be not so handy and sounds more like a
> hack. If I got you right: decompress means back to raw data? If so, I'd
> really prefer the second approach. Adding png would be an useless layer of
> complexity, I think.

agreed. it's guaranteed to be usable by everyone, even weirdos without png 
support ;) , and looks faster. so +1 for that.

for the 10 icons in my system tray right now, it would take ~25-30ms to 
transfer them. that's approximately 40x faster than it currently takes just 
one of the icons to show up in the tray right now.

wow.

> Oh, forgot to say: great work :)

+1

-- 
Aaron J. Seigo
humru othro a kohnu se
GPG Fingerprint: 8B8B 2209 0C6F 7C47 B1EA  EE75 D6B7 2EB1 A7F1 DB43

KDE core developer sponsored by Qt Software

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/plasma-devel/attachments/20090331/716e9865/attachment.sig