patch review

[Robert Knight]

> i'd like us to try it over the next couple of weeks. we can then come back and
> compare notes and see if we like it, don't like it, etc.

Strikes me as an excellent idea.  I hope it works well.  I may be
jumping ahead a little, but a couple of immediate thoughts:

* Can this be extended to UI reviews?  Qt designer forms are stored as
simple XML so they could presumably be treated the same as code.  All
that is needed is something to run on the server which generates a
preview given a Qt designer file for inclusion alongside the code.
The same applies for graphics (including mockups) done in SVG.
* How might this work alongside bugs.kde.org?

Regards,
Robert.

On 30/01/2008, William Egert <begert at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> 2008/1/30 Aaron J. Seigo <aseigo at kde.org>:
> > hi all...
> >
> >
> > thoughts?
> >
>
>
> This sounds like a really good idea/tool.  With the recent (maybe not so
> "recent") rise in this mailing lists activity, its been tricky attempting to
> follow everything thats been going on.  Breaking the patches part into a
> tool will make things easier.
>
> -Bill
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Panel-devel mailing list
> Panel-devel at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/panel-devel
>
>