[Owncloud] Gitorious vs Github
Thomas Müller
thomas.mueller at tmit.eu
Sat Jun 2 09:02:38 UTC 2012
But travis-ci is not enough, because it doesn't support C++ and the required tools for php code analysis are not available either.
We will use jenkins.
Tom
Roland van Laar <roland at micite.net> schrieb:
>On 05/30/2012 08:11 AM, Thomas Müller wrote:
>> From my point of view we have much more important topics than a discussion on gitorious vs github.
>>
>> - continous intregration
>Well.. Travis-ci integrates with github.
>Travis-ci.org is an extremely easy to use, free for opensource software
>hosted CI solution.
>
>You're right. A Github vs Gitorious debate is just more bikeshedding.
>
>Roland
>
>> - more php unit tests
>> - js unit tests
>> - overall test management (looks like the RCs for OC4 have never been tested)
>>
>> And most important : configure buggenie properly. As I wrote many times, buggenie itself is not bad tool (maybe not the best) it just needs some love. I hope we find some time after the bugfix releases for OC4
>>
>> Tom
>>
>> Jan-Christoph Borchardt<hey at jancborchardt.net> schrieb:
>>
>>> Against the risk of repeating myself, it is completely ridiculous for
>>> us to host our own stuff. If it’s free software but not federated, we
>>> create an island of user interaction where everyone has to get yet
>>> another new account.
>>> Another thing, Indefero has a really shitty interface. From their
>>> website: »Indefero is basically a clone of GoogleCode« – seriously?
>>>
>>> Even though I don’t think this is a question of »democratic« decision,
>>> the majority is pretty clear from the Doodle Lennart opened a while
>>> ago: http://www.doodle.com/gpqix9engytkyavq (as of writing: 12 Github,
>>> 5 Gitorious, 4 don’t know)
>>>
>>> Make no mistake – we discussed this several times already and we are
>>> all free software activists. We discussed it last time before the move
>> >from KDE projects to Gitorious and we discuss it this time as well. I
>>> get that this is an issue where lots of people have an opinion on the
>>> color of the bike shed – but in this case especially the opinion of
>>> the core developers has value, who need to work with the system
>>> (namely Gitorious and Buggenie) and are reasonably pissed about load
>>> times, SSH issues, downtimes and general usability nightmares. And
>>> there are some simple factors like exposure and developer base which
>>> are very important for driving the project forward.
>>>
>>>
>>> So if in the meantime there popped up a nice _federated_ open source
>>> git web app with integrated issue tracking and pull requests (which
>>> can be linked) which we ideally don’t need to host ourselves – then
>>> please speak up. Otherwise I would suggest we, as said before the
>>> release of ownCloud 4, move to Github.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 11:58 PM, Denis Kot<denis.kot at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Take a look at InDefero http://projects.ceondo.com/p/indefero/
>>>> I have installed it at my few servers and it works very good. It has
>>>> build-in bug tracker (minimalistic), code review, web-gui for git
>>>> repository and forge management.
>>>>
>>>> Denis Kot
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Owncloud mailing list
>>>> Owncloud at kde.org
>>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Owncloud mailing list
>>> Owncloud at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
>> _______________________________________________
>> Owncloud mailing list
>> Owncloud at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
>
>_______________________________________________
>Owncloud mailing list
>Owncloud at kde.org
>https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/owncloud
More information about the Owncloud
mailing list