[okular] [Bug 509815] New: Stamp annotation has low quality (regression)
Andrea Ippolito
bugzilla_noreply at kde.org
Tue Sep 23 07:22:24 BST 2025
https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=509815
Bug ID: 509815
Summary: Stamp annotation has low quality (regression)
Classification: Applications
Product: okular
Version First 25.08.1
Reported In:
Platform: Other
OS: Linux
Status: REPORTED
Severity: normal
Priority: NOR
Component: general
Assignee: okular-devel at kde.org
Reporter: andrea.ippo at gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
I used to "sign" PDFs all the time by just stamping a scan of my signature at
the right place, using Okular.
My signature is saved as a png with transparency (or .ico), and defined as a
custom annotation.
This has worked very well until recently-ish (I think a few months now, but
never found the time to report this).
Now whenever I stamp my signature on a PDF, it results in a low quality image
which anyone could tell is digital.
My current workaround is to use Xournal++, which isn't affected by this.
To reproduce:
- download this John Doe signature (which is definitely high quality):
https://www.clipartkey.com/downpng/wxmohi_signature-image-john-doe/
- open Okular Settings (Ctrl + Shift + ,), go to Annotations
- click on the Add... button
- name it anything you like, select as a type "Stamp" from the dropdown
- in the appearance section, leave opacity at 100%, and click the browse icon
near Stamp symbol to pick the previously downloaded signature image file
- confirm everything and close
Now open any PDF file and insert this annotation.
It should appear in high quality, instead it appears as shown in my attachment
With the same signature image file, open the same PDF file with Xournal++ and
just paste the image into it: it will display perfectly
A few releases ago this would work great and Okular would deliver the same
sharp result that I'm now only getting with Xournal++
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the Okular-devel
mailing list