[okular] [Bug 435260] Strange checking for signing bounds

[Oleg Solovyov]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=435260

--- Comment #7 from Oleg Solovyov <mcpain at altlinux.org> ---
(In reply to Albert Astals Cid from comment #6)
> I honestly don't see how that is a problem
That definitely doesn't mean that there is no problem.

Will this bug being fixed cause any problems?
Or fixing this bug will be a problem itself?
If answers are "no", I can apply the same "why this is a problem" logic.

> so why does it matter whether that part is included or not when viewing what was signed?

Documentation says:
> Returns the part of document covered by the given signature @p info.
In current implementation uncovered parts are returned when there are gaps.
Hence, there is documentation/behavior mismatch.

PS why you're asking such questions if you certain that there is no matter
whether that part is included or not?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.