Should we revert the QScroller patch?

[Oliver Sander]

As a user with a touch screen I must say that I really enjoy Kezi's QScroller patch.
Inertia-less scrolling on a touchscreen feels very clumsy.

Therefore I vote for keeping the patch and fixing the regressions.

Best,
Oliver

On 21.05.20 00:19, Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> It has brought several regressions compared to the [small] "nicer" scrolling improvement.
> 
> Kezi Olio seems to have proposed patches that solve some but there's still quite a few of them open.
> 
> What's your opinion?
> 
> Cheers,
>   Albert
> 
> 

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 5198 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/okular-devel/attachments/20200521/1f7c7c5e/attachment.bin>