[okular] [Bug 406269] pdf document with empty signature field is claimed to be signed

[Albert Astals Cid]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=406269

--- Comment #4 from Albert Astals Cid <aacid at kde.org> ---
(In reply to Nate Graham from comment #3)
> Not an expert on this stuff so let me ask some questions:
> 
> - What exactly do you mean by "shitty broken signatures?"

Lots of fields are missing.

> - Are shitty broken signatures valid?

Depends on what you mean by valid :D The existing contents are not wrong, they
just miss lots of fields that make them quite shitty and not very useful.

> Can they be legitimately used for any purpose?

Most probably not.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.