[Okular-devel] [okular] [Bug 351973] Missing Comment in desktop file

[Alex]

https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351973

Alex <loginov.alex.valer at gmail.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |UNCONFIRMED
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---

--- Comment #4 from Alex <loginov.alex.valer at gmail.com> ---
> Because having a GenericName makes sense
Yes, for KDE only.
Having a Comment makes sense too.

> They are doing it wrong, 
Not. You do it wrong. Missing DE, what uses GenericName, except KDE. But
Comment is in use by KDE too. If somebody want to add "Keywords" or other
optional key, why not?

> the spec is quite clear you should not be redundant
You understand spec wrong. Spec is about: Name <> GenericName <> Comment. All
fields are different.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.