[Okular-devel] Review Request: Fix for the bug-166645

[Jaydeep Solanki]

> On Aug. 29, 2012, 11:19 p.m., Albert Astals Cid wrote:
> > Ok, this fixes all the "obvious" problems with the code, now there are the non obvious ones, like for example, we assume that there's only one part per process, thus the dbus api is modelled after that, exposing just one part and just one shell, model that is obviously broken if I commit this change.
> > 
> > Question is, are you willing to work on fixing those issues after I commit this patch?

Yes I'd like to work on it, but I don't know much about dbus..


- Jaydeep


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105965/#review18264
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 22, 2012, 10:33 a.m., Jaydeep Solanki wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105965/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 22, 2012, 10:33 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch is a fix for the bug-166645, as listed here (https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166645)
> 
> Opens a new instance of Okular for every other file that is opened.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   part.h d9a5cc4 
>   part.cpp 7c1ca71 
>   shell/shell.h 8430b9c 
>   shell/shell.cpp 8b99ce4 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105965/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Jaydeep Solanki
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/okular-devel/attachments/20120904/9748a4ea/attachment.html>