[Nepomuk] How to config virtuoso-t?

[Michael Jerger]

Am Mittwoch, 8. Januar 2014, 13:08:30 schrieb Vishesh Handa:
> The next version of KMail is not going to be using Nepomuk. We're moving
> away from virtuoso and the whole "semantic web".
> 
> So you should have a better KMail experience with 4.13

Sounds good for KMail - bad for the semantic web idea.
Would your new Mail-/Contact-/Calendar-Storage have an semantic interface? I 
like the idea, to have RDF acces to all my stuff (which does not mean, that all 
data has to be stored redundant in virtuoso also)?

> > enterprise service I've similar problems - so do you have made any brain
> > work for this topic allready? May I be interested in your ideas and
> > experiance?
> 
> Most of the Nepomuk developers had grand ideas about sharing the
> Nepomuk data. In fact I once prototyped a distributed nepomuk service
> which would register itself on the local network and allow sparql queries to
> be run on all the systems in a local network.
> 
> That was terribly impractical because of the issue of privacy. We then
> thought about implementing some sort of an ACL for the rdf data, but the
> more we tried to plan it out, the more complex it got. Eventually, nothing
> got done.

Okay - thanks for your straight answer. I've seen some whitepapers about "data 
based authorization" in semantic graphs and I agree totaly - it seemd to be 
very complex. Maybe this complexity is apropriate for the enterrise context. I 
will give it a try.


Michael
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20140109/0a6ef820/attachment.sig>