[Nepomuk] Review Request 113128: Don't delete a QObject from inside a slot.
Vishesh Handa
me at vhanda.in
Mon Oct 7 12:01:09 UTC 2013
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113128/#review41338
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
If you're having problems with the telepathy service crashing, then I can port it to Nepomuk::Service2 whose architecture is a lot better. Plus you get your own process name.
Should I do it?
- Vishesh Handa
On Oct. 6, 2013, 10:49 a.m., David Edmundson wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113128/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Oct. 6, 2013, 10:49 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Nepomuk.
>
>
> Repository: nepomuk-core
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Don't delete a QObject from inside a slot.
>
> If there are any pending calls to that object to be processed deleting
> the object can cause them to crash. (such as in KTp's service)
>
> Using deleteLater() is safer.
>
> BUG: 325376
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> servicestub/servicecontrol.cpp efc8eb8
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/113128/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> David Edmundson
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20131007/38e9efd8/attachment.html>
More information about the Nepomuk
mailing list