[Nepomuk] Review Request 108773: Simple Plugin System for the NepomukCleaner

[Sebastian Trueg]

> On Feb. 5, 2013, 1:33 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > Do you think it would be better if we clubbed the CleaningJob in the nepomukcore library? Or should we really have this other cleaning library?

I think it should be separate since in an ideal world this tool would never be required. it is more of a high-level hack.


- Sebastian


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108773/#review26692
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Feb. 4, 2013, 3:46 p.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108773/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Feb. 4, 2013, 3:46 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> This patch adds a simple plugin-system to the NepomukCleaner allowing other applications to install Nepomuk2::CleaningJobs whcih are run in addition to the default jobs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   cleaner/CMakeLists.txt af7f94b 
>   cleaner/cleaningjob.h PRE-CREATION 
>   cleaner/cleaningjob.cpp PRE-CREATION 
>   cleaner/cleaningjobs.h e17bdfe 
>   cleaner/cleaningjobs.cpp 05addda 
>   cleaner/jobmodel.h a7b0618 
>   cleaner/jobmodel.cpp 8aadc83 
>   cleaner/nepomukcleaningjob.desktop PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/108773/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Implemented two CleaningJobs for TV shows - works fine.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Sebastian Trueg
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20130205/1524099c/attachment.html>