[Nepomuk] Review Request 109856: FIX: exiv2extractor did not import exif datetime.

Ignacio Serantes kde at aynoa.net
Fri Apr 5 10:37:06 UTC 2013



> On April 5, 2013, 12:14 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > services/fileindexer/indexer/exiv2extractor.cpp, line 30
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109856/diff/2-3/?file=131256#file131256line30>
> >
> >     I think this is not required.

You are right, I removed it and all works.


- Ignacio


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109856/#review30441
-----------------------------------------------------------


On April 5, 2013, 12:35 p.m., Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109856/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated April 5, 2013, 12:35 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Vishesh Handa.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> There was a FIXME in exiv2extractor.cpp about datetime exif tag and I wrote the code required to convert information to exif format to xsd:datetime.
> 
> I'm using val.setUtcOffset(0) to convert datetime generated by QDateTime::fromString() because datetime information stored in exif is in local time. If there is a better method to do this please inform me.
> 
> This fix don't fix exactly the bug https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317501 because the bug is related to datetimes collected with strigi, but will permit to reindex images and solve the issue. In brief I'm not sure if I must assign this review to the bug or not.
> 
> 
> This addresses bug 317501.
>     http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=317501
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   services/fileindexer/indexer/exiv2extractor.cpp 7c7fe21 
>   services/fileindexer/indexer/extractorplugin.cpp 5d834c9 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/109856/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> With several photos in JPEG and NEF format comparing values obtained by extractor with values obtained by Digikam and exiv2 console program.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ignacio Serantes
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20130405/1b7c990d/attachment.html>


More information about the Nepomuk mailing list