[Nepomuk] Review Request: Use KApplication instead of QApplication - Required for KIdleTime

[Vishesh Handa]

> On Sept. 18, 2012, 2:03 p.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> > Does this re-activate the KApp DBus interface? If not, then go ahead.


$ qdbus org.kde.NepomukStorage
/
/MainApplication    ------------------- THIS?
/backupmanager
/datamanagement
/nepomukontologyloader
/nepomukqueryservice
/nepomukstorage
/resourcewatcher
/resourcewatcher/watch1
/servicecontrol


- Vishesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106487/#review19107
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Sept. 18, 2012, 11:02 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106487/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Sept. 18, 2012, 11:02 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Sebastian Trueg.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
>  This reverts part of commit 5e60ad6fc0aae.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   servicestub/main.cpp a351c4a 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/106487/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> KIdleTime now works
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishesh Handa
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20120918/05633c22/attachment.html>