[Nepomuk] Review Request: Remove old code from the ResourceManager

Vishesh Handa me at vhanda.in
Mon Jun 25 08:18:40 UTC 2012



> On June 14, 2012, 7:28 p.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> > libnepomukcore/resource/resourcemanager.h, line 105
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105247/diff/1/?file=67595#file67595line105>
> >
> >     Actually we can also remove this as it does not make sense anymore - we are using the DMS for writing now which cannot be replaced.
> 
> Vishesh Handa wrote:
>     A lot of the Nepomuk::Resource tests use this. Should I just throw away those tests?
> 
> Sebastian Trueg wrote:
>     I would say "yes". And then recreate tests using the same "FakeDataManagementService" approach we use for the DMS tests.
> 
> Vishesh Handa wrote:
>     Alright. I'm just throwing them away from now.
> 
> Vishesh Handa wrote:
>     urgh. The QueryParser tests use them as well. I'll investigate more later.
> 
> Vishesh Handa wrote:
>     I cannot seem to figure out how to do the "FakeDataManagementService" approach for ResourceManager. Could you please elaborate? 
>     
>     Right now I'm inclined to let the ResourceManager::setOverrideMainModel stay.

For now I'm just committing this. We have the stupid RC1 freeze today, after which we are required to pass everything through the release team :/


- Vishesh


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105247/#review14743
-----------------------------------------------------------


On June 13, 2012, 9:06 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105247/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated June 13, 2012, 9:06 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Remove old code from the ResourceManager
> 
> Lesser code is easier to understand, plus we are allowed to break
> ABI and API compatibility right now!
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   libnepomukcore/resource/resourcemanager.h 012cde5c684cc15bb9983ff35cc95ac03757f679 
>   libnepomukcore/resource/resourcemanager.cpp f510673944c374cff99fe9cce621601b2a0e9cf2 
>   libnepomukcore/resource/resourcemanager_p.h 2143642e586ff4e5d5f530b0b20340fbe7b81753 
>   libnepomukcore/test/resourcetest.cpp 82e26c36436f58774b3b86fe1a25d084a65a6217 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105247/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishesh Handa
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20120625/759d888d/attachment.html>


More information about the Nepomuk mailing list