[Nepomuk] Review Request: Introduce fall-back indexing

[Sebastian Trueg]

-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105730/#review16398
-----------------------------------------------------------


I thought strigi would do this anyway. I am fine with the patch if it does not but down the line this is not the place for it. libstreamanalyzer should always add the basic fields (which again I think it does...). Could it be a strigi crash that results in the file not being indexed?

- Sebastian Trueg


On July 25, 2012, 2:59 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105730/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 25, 2012, 2:59 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Sebastian Trueg.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
>     If the strigi indexer fails to index the file, we index it with this new
>     "simple indexer" which just sets the basic properties like url,
>     filename and the mimetype.
>     
>     This way, file which weren't indexed, will at least still appear in some
>     of the search results.
>     
>     The nie:lastModifed for these files has not been set, so the
>     indexscheduler will still find these files, and try to index them again.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   services/fileindexer/indexer/CMakeLists.txt 1a5a506 
>   services/fileindexer/indexer/main.cpp e3c7288 
>   services/fileindexer/indexer/simpleindexer.h PRE-CREATION 
>   services/fileindexer/indexer/simpleindexer.cpp PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105730/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Manually tested
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishesh Handa
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20120725/f5f0f0cd/attachment.html>