[Nepomuk] Review Request: Add Resource::symbols()

Sebastian Trueg sebastian at trueg.de
Sun Jul 15 13:00:06 UTC 2012


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105570/#review15879
-----------------------------------------------------------

Ship it!


Ship It!

- Sebastian Trueg


On July 14, 2012, 12:26 p.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105570/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated July 14, 2012, 12:26 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk, Sebastian Trueg and Laurent Montel.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Add Resource::symbols()
> 
> They still return a string list instead of a QList<Resource>, but that's
> only cause they are easier to use this way. And this way we can avoid
> duplicates, cause I doubt the client will actually check for duplicates.
> Specially since checking for duplicates involves writing a sparql query.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   libnepomukcore/resource/resource.h d50f689 
>   libnepomukcore/resource/resource.cpp 733f8d4 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/105570/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Vishesh Handa
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20120715/9d98caf5/attachment.html>


More information about the Nepomuk mailing list