[Nepomuk] Review Request: Fix crash when using nepomukcleaner with nepomuk disabled.
Vishesh Handa
me at vhanda.in
Tue Dec 18 05:10:28 UTC 2012
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107793/#review23648
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Please commit to KDE/4.10
About that other commit, feel free to merge 'master' into KDE/4.10. AFAIK, it shouldn't break anything. If that doesn't work, then you can cherry-pick.
cleaner/mainwindow.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107793/#comment18107>
?
- Vishesh Handa
On Dec. 18, 2012, 1:54 a.m., Simeon Bird wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107793/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Dec. 18, 2012, 1:54 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Nepomuk.
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> Fix crash when using nepomukcleaner with nepomuk disabled. When nepomuk is disabled, now just exits.
>
> Needs the related soprano review to actually work
>
> ==Unrelated==
> Could I also backport 56e476cd9b995143b4ca9a67257dc7642c879841 to KDE/4.10?
>
> It fixes a crash, of the sort that we would probably get hundreds of bug reports about if it were released, in a pretty uncontroversial manner,
> so I committed it to master before noticing the release freeze had already started.
>
>
> This addresses bug 311753.
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=311753
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> cleaner/jobmodel.cpp e8e9acf
> cleaner/mainwindow.cpp 9b7f0c7
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107793/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Yup, no crash!
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Simeon Bird
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20121218/5606cfb2/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Nepomuk
mailing list