[Nepomuk] Nepomuk::ResourceWatcher: Performance issues

[Sebastian Trüg]

I just saw that you only copied the header and link to
"nepomukdatamanagement". In that case there is no need for the header
since you depend on kde-runtime anyway. :)

On 04/14/2012 10:21 PM, Peter Penz wrote:
> On 04/14/2012 10:02 PM, Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>> On 04/06/2012 02:48 PM, Peter Penz wrote:
> [...]
>>> - Invoking ResourceWatcher::addResource() after invoking
>>> ResourceWatcher::start() has no effect. As workaround before adding a
>>> resource I needed to invoke ResourceWatcher::stop(), add the resource
>>> and invoke ResourceWatcher::start() again. The problem with this
>>> workaround is the performance: Calling stop() clears e.g. 15000 items
>>> and calling start() after adding one resource adds 15001 items again. In
>>> the case of the directory with 20000 this might take up a few seconds
>>> for each (!) of the items in the upper-range.
>>
>> I implemented support for that a while ago. Where did you copy the RW
>> from?
> 
> Sounds good ;-) I've copied it from the KDE/4.8 branch due to the
> kdelibs-freeze - I did not check the other branches, but probably you
> pushed it to the frameworks branch?
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>