[Nepomuk] Fwd: GSoC 2012 - Testing and Benchmarking in Nepomuk

[Raveendra Bhat]

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Raveendra Bhat <ravee.bhat69 at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 12:50 AM
Subject: Re: [Nepomuk] GSoC 2012 - Testing and Benchmarking in Nepomuk
To: Vishesh Handa <me at vhanda.in>


Hi Vishesh,

Firstly thanks for your replyI went through your blog post and had a look
at your code. I could able to understand your filewatcher test and
identificationtest. I have some doubts with respect to what needs to be
done in the GSoC period.

1. Project statement clearly says, I need to write testcases for nepomuk
services. Does it involve ontology,storage,query and strigi services? What
exactly do you mean by porting Nepomuk::Resources to the testing framework?
Writing testcases for all Nepomuk::Resource properties/methods?
2. According to my knowledge about bench marks, I believe that it should be
done on 2 seperate systems under test. Can you please give me a clear
picture of *benchmarking* the caching time,property fetch time?
3.Bench marking for file indexer means some tool like system monitor which
displays memory and CPU usage of the indexer?

Waiting for your reply. Mean while I'll be looking at your code and will
come up with a proof of concept.


On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Vishesh Handa <me at vhanda.in> wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Raveendra Bhat <ravee.bhat69 at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>>   I am Raveendra from India. I am interested in writing a Test framework
>> for nepomuk.  I have a basic knowledge how nepomuk works.I am familiar with
>> Qt C++ development.But i am not familiar with testing libraries in Qt/C++.
>>
>> Please can you tell me more in details about this project? I want to be a
>> Kontributor.
>>
>
> Hey Raveendra
>
> I'm basically expecting someone to continue with my test framework [1].
> That would involved porting the Nepomuk::Resource tests to the test
> framework, cause they now require a dbus session.
>
> Additionally, I would want benchmarks on Nepomuk::Resource. How long does
> it take to fill up the cache? Fetching properties and so on. You'll even
> need to write more tests for it.
>
> Now with the introduction with Nepomuk 2.0 and the data management API, I
> would want benchmarks on the new functions as well. ( They already have a
> lot of unit tests, so you do not need to write those )
>
> I guess, I'd also want some kind of benchmarks for the file indexer.
>
> That's just the start. Look at every existing nepomuk service. If they do
> not have tests, they need them.
>
> [1] http://vhanda.in/blog/2012/03/nepomuk-test-framework/
>
>>
>> --
>> regards,
>>
>> B R Raveendra
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Nepomuk mailing list
>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Vishesh Handa
>
>


-- 
regards,

B R Raveendra




-- 
regards,

B R Raveendra
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20120401/408a9fb9/attachment.html>