[Nepomuk] Review Request: Don't start second virtuoso server while the first one is starting up

[Yury Georgievich Kudryashov]

> On Aug. 29, 2011, 2:34 p.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> > Looks good to me but some testing would be nice indeed. :)

Just found that I've forgotten to publish the reply I've typed about on August 30th...

I've tried to start/stop nepomukserver a few times, and every time I saw only one Virtuoso welcome message in the logs. Earlier I saw two welcome messages.


- Yury Georgievich


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102466/#review6141
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Aug. 28, 2011, 8:09 a.m., Yury Georgievich Kudryashov wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102466/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Aug. 28, 2011, 8:09 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Soprano.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Don't try to start new virtuoso server process if current status is not NotRunning (say, StartingUp).
> 
> Also remove isRunning() since this function leads to bugs.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   backends/virtuoso/virtuosocontroller.h 63b3781 
>   backends/virtuoso/virtuosocontroller.cpp 664bf3a 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102466/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> I've tested that it compiles, but didn't test the result yet.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Yury Georgievich
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20110911/28e5d161/attachment.html>