[Nepomuk] Strigi indexer in email feeder

[Christian Mollekopf]

On Thursday 29 September 2011 09.41:47 Sebastian Trüg wrote:
> Normally forcing the uri should still work. The only difference is that
> it will be stored as nie:url instead of being used as actual resource
> URI. Did you already try it?

Hey,

Sorry for the late answer.
You're right, that should actually work, but I haven't tested it yet.

Cheers,
Christian

> 
> Cheers,
> Sebastian
> 
> On 09/26/2011 11:17 PM, Christian Mollekopf wrote:
> > Hey,
> > 
> > In the email feeder we used to be leaving some indexing tasks up to
> > strigi, which was done by code like this:
> > 
> > KProcess proc;
> > proc.setOutputChannelMode( KProcess::ForwardedChannels );
> > proc.setProgram( KStandardDirs::findExe( "nepomukindexer" ); );
> > proc << "--uri" << url.url().toLocal8Bit();
> > proc << "--mtime" << QString::number( mtime.toTime_t() );
> > proc.start();
> > if ( proc.waitForStarted() ) {
> > 
> >   proc.write( data );
> >   proc.waitForBytesWritten();
> >   proc.closeWriteChannel();
> > 
> > }
> > proc.waitForFinished();
> > 
> > Now that I switched to the dms, I don't think forcing the uri works any
> > longer.
> > 
> > One usecase for this is the indexing of attachments. Right now I'm only
> > creating a Nepomuk::NCAL::Attachment, but don't know how to index the
> > data with strigi. The attachment is just a QByteArray of data, so not a
> > regular file in the filesystem. There is ncal:attachmentContent, but I
> > don't know if that would result in the same.
> > The old version just forced an uri in the style of
> > "akonadi:?item=123#attachmentName", when indexing the QByteArray with
> > strigi.
> > 
> > 
> > The second usecase is the indexing of non plaintext messages. Here I
> > have
> > again the problem how to index the data (again a QByteArray) that it
> > ends up being associated with the email, of which I don't know the
> > resource uri yet because of the dms.
> > Also here, the old version was to force the uri of the indexed data to
> > be the akonadi-uri of the email.
> > 
> > Any ideas how this could be done in a sane way?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Christian
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nepomuk mailing list
> > Nepomuk at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk