[Nepomuk] Resources deletion

Tue Oct 4 18:18:07 UTC 2011

I don't use a tarball. I follow the link in the message where you inform
about the fix and I done the next.

git clone git://anongit.kde.org/nepomuk-core
cd nepomuk-core
mkdir build
cd build
cmake -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=`kde4-config --prefix`  ..
make
stop nepomuk
sudo make install
start nepomuk

I not sure if I done the things well.

On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:

> what did you compile? git branch KDE/4.7? or some release tarball?
>
> On 10/04/2011 07:42 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> > I tried the patch and seems that is working. I'm not totally sure
> > because one Nepomuk's service is crashing and nepomukserver don't stop
> > without killing it :).
> >
> > I'm totally new to this so I don't know if I done something wrong or if
> > the next information is useful. I will try to improve my C++ skills.
> > -------------------
> >
> > Application: Nepomuk Service Stub (nepomukservicestub), signal:
> > Segmentation fault
> >
> > [KCrash Handler]
> >
> > #6 0x00007faec8f3df4f in Nepomuk::Repository::close (this=0x7e6ac0) at
> > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/repository.cpp:86
> >
> > #7 0x00007faec8f3e07d in Nepomuk::Repository::~Repository
> > (this=0x7e6ac0, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at
> > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/repository.cpp:75
> >
> > #8 0x00007faec8f3e159 in Nepomuk::Repository::~Repository
> > (this=0x7e6ac0, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at
> > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/repository.cpp:76
> >
> > #9 0x00007faec8d01d5f in Soprano::Server::ServerCore::~ServerCore() ()
> > from /usr/lib64/libsopranoserver.so.1
> >
> > #10 0x00007faec8f3ce45 in Nepomuk::Core::~Core (this=0x74b150,
> > __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at
> > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/nepomukcore.cpp:45
> >
> > #11 0x00007faec8f3cec9 in Nepomuk::Core::~Core (this=0x74b150,
> > __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at
> > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/nepomukcore.cpp:48
> >
> > #12 0x00007faed74fb084 in QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren() () from
> > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
> >
> > #13 0x00007faed74ffd32 in QObject::~QObject() () from
> > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
> >
> > #14 0x00007faec8f3c0b3 in ~Storage (this=<value optimized out>,
> > __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at
> > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/storage.cpp:54
> >
> > #15 Nepomuk::Storage::~Storage (this=<value optimized out>,
> > __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at
> > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/services/storage/storage.cpp:56
> >
> > #16 0x00007faed74fb084 in QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren() () from
> > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
> >
> > #17 0x00007faed74ffd32 in QObject::~QObject() () from
> > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
> >
> > #18 0x0000000000404d59 in Nepomuk::ServiceControl::~ServiceControl
> > (this=0x74a2f0, __in_chrg=<value optimized out>) at
> > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/servicestub/servicecontrol.cpp:41
> >
> > #19 0x00007faed74fb084 in QObjectPrivate::deleteChildren() () from
> > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
> >
> > #20 0x00007faed74ffd32 in QObject::~QObject() () from
> > /usr/lib64/libQtCore.so.4
> >
> > #21 0x00007faed52b5e22 in QApplication::~QApplication() () from
> > /usr/lib64/libQtGui.so.4
> >
> > #22 0x00000000004044fc in main (argc=36, argv=0x7fff2e34bd78) at
> > /home/ignacio/devel/nepomuk-core/servicestub/main.cpp:105
> >
> > --------------------
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:58 PM, Ignacio Serantes <kde at aynoa.net
> > <mailto:kde at aynoa.net>> wrote:
> >
> >     On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 2:54 PM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org
> >     <mailto:trueg at kde.org>> wrote:
> >
> >         On 10/04/2011 01:24 PM, Ignacio Serantes wrote:
> >         >
> >         > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org
> >         <mailto:trueg at kde.org>
> >         > <mailto:trueg at kde.org <mailto:trueg at kde.org>>> wrote:
> >         >
> >         >     Ok, the bug is fixed now. :)
> >         >
> >         >
> >         > I will try to find time to compile Nepomuk sources and update
> >         my system
> >         > to test the patch. This will be my first time doing something
> >         like this
> >         > so I'm starting to pray...
> >         >
> >         > On the other side, what about the configuration issue?
> >
> >         What is the problem? IMHO the configuration is easy: index
> external
> >
> >         media or not index them. Manually added information is completely
> >         unrelated to this and cannot be influenced by any configuration.
> >
> >
> >     The problem is last night I changed from "Index filex on all
> >     removable devices" to "Ignore all removable media" and all my
> >     resources was deleted again. I do the test with one HD connected and
> >     the other disconnected and resources of both HDs was deleted. By the
> >     way I don't know if you consider Bangarand metadata manual or not :).
> >
> >     I will try to reproduce the problem.
> >
> >     --
> >     Best wishes,
> >     Ignacio
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best wishes,
> > Ignacio
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nepomuk mailing list
> > Nepomuk at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
> _______________________________________________
> Nepomuk mailing list
> Nepomuk at kde.org
> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>

-- 
Best wishes,
Ignacio
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20111004/942bcec9/attachment.html>