[Nepomuk] Re: Review Request: Activity ResourceInstance class for API review

[Ivan Čukić]

> On May 2, 2011, 1:03 p.m., Sebastian Trueg wrote:
> > experimental/libkactivities/ResourceInstance.h, line 105
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101273/diff/1/?file=15799#file15799line105>
> >
> >     As mentioned on IRC I am not sure about this. How would accessing the new resource be handled then? Normally creating the RI instance does that. But if the resource changes regularly how do I tell the system that I accessed the new resource/URI?

This is one that is here only for SLC and special cases applications. We (usage stats part) can't use it.


- Ivan


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101273/#review3043
-----------------------------------------------------------


On May 2, 2011, 1:07 p.m., Ivan Čukić wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101273/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated May 2, 2011, 1:07 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Nepomuk and Plasma.
> 
> 
> Summary
> -------
> 
> Desc of the class is in the class apidocs
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   experimental/libkactivities/ResourceInstance.h PRE-CREATION 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/101273/diff
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ivan
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20110502/e2cfdeae/attachment.htm