[Nepomuk] Re: Review Request: Give Nepomuk the lowest Priority in the Scheduler
Sebastian Trueg
sebastian at trueg.de
Thu Jul 28 11:24:33 CEST 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102044/#review5160
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
ok then.
- Sebastian
On July 22, 2011, 8:17 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102044/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated July 22, 2011, 8:17 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Nepomuk and Sebastian Trueg.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> I've changed the scheduling of all Nepomuk services from SCHED_BATCH to SCHED_IDLE. Maybe this should only be done for the "nepomukindexer"?
>
> Reference: http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man2/sched_getscheduler.2.html
>
> If this is accepted, I'll like to backport it as well.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> nepomuk/servicestub/priority.cpp 1c4e5687
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102044/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> I've tested it on my desktop and I find that I just don't notice when files are being indexed. Before this it was slightly noticeable as the computer would become slightly sluggish.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vishesh
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20110728/9cdb1837/attachment.htm
More information about the Nepomuk
mailing list