[Nepomuk] Re: Review Request: WritebackJob draft
Sebastian Trueg
sebastian at trueg.de
Wed Jul 27 21:12:13 CEST 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#review5136
-----------------------------------------------------------
nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackjob.h
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#comment4627>
there is actually no need for the parameter since you have m_resource.
nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackjob.h
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#comment4628>
This slot is not correct. The plugin's finished signal has only one parameter: the plugin itself. Thus, the connection will fail since the signal does not provide a resource.
nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackjob.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#comment4629>
Maybe just as an exersise add
Q_ASSERT(m_resource.isValid())
and
Q_ASSERT(!m_plugins.isEmpty())
nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackjob.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#comment4630>
This is still wrong. I even provided the code!
nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackservice.h
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#comment4631>
this is not used.
nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackservice.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#comment4632>
The !plugins.contains(plugin) is pointless. The list can never contain the plugin since you just created it.
nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackservice.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#comment4633>
You do this within the loop!
Think about what you actually want to do!
nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackservice.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#comment4634>
same as above.
nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackservice.cpp
<http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/#comment4635>
same as above.
- Sebastian
On July 27, 2011, 6:55 p.m., Smit Shah wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated July 27, 2011, 6:55 p.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Nepomuk.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> This is my first attempt to write the writebackjob for the writebackservice.
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> nepomuk/services/writeback/lib/writebackplugin.h 6bcdfd3
> nepomuk/services/writeback/lib/writebackplugin.cpp 2a52a31
> nepomuk/services/writeback/service/CMakeLists.txt 949b379
> nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackjob.h e69de29
> nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackjob.cpp e69de29
> nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackservice.h a9821a6
> nepomuk/services/writeback/service/writebackservice.cpp be5c738
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102094/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Smit
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20110727/3a8a4f7e/attachment-0001.htm
More information about the Nepomuk
mailing list