[Nepomuk] Re: nepomuk init notification

[Chani]

whoops, we wandered offlist. :)
I'm bringing this back here just for history's sake (unarchived discussions 
are doomed to be repeated ;)
oh, but if anyone can answer the BC question that'd be nice too :)

On January 5, 2011 15:20:01 you wrote:
> On January 5, 2011 14:51:34 you wrote:
> > > so... are you ok with that patch (just the dbus call) for 4.6?
> > 
> > yes, ofc
> 
> k, will commit to the branch then :)
> 
> > > mrr. I'm still torn, for 4.7... would a signal in kactivitymanagerd be
> > > a useful abstraction, or just inefficiency?
> > 
> > I'm not sure - kamd will have multiple backends - for different stuff
> > (nepomuk and zeitgeist at least) so I'd rather have an API which
> > allows the user not to know anything about N and Z.

note: either way KActivityInfo is that api, but with a signal in kamd, anyone 
who needed to use it directly would also not need to know it uses nepomuk for 
icons.

> > 
> > Is removing a library link a BC change? (if we decide at some point
> > that storing the icon in Nepomuk is too much)
> 
> I don't know, but I expect it's safe?

-- 
Chani
http://chani.ca
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20110105/6aa727db/attachment.sig