[Nepomuk] Review Request: Thread Safety in the IndexScheduler
Sebastian Trueg
sebastian at trueg.de
Wed Aug 10 11:57:34 UTC 2011
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102251/#review5587
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
- Sebastian
On Aug. 10, 2011, 11:24 a.m., Vishesh Handa wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102251/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated Aug. 10, 2011, 11:24 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for Nepomuk and Sebastian Trueg.
>
>
> Summary
> -------
>
> Many of the variables need to be accessed in IndexScheduler need to be protected with a mutex.
>
> I think it's better to use multiple mutexes instead of one.
>
>
> This addresses bug 279347.
> http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=279347
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> nepomuk/services/strigi/indexscheduler.h 4c83d04
> nepomuk/services/strigi/indexscheduler.cpp 7fd4dcb
>
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/102251/diff
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
> Nope. Don't know how to test this.
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Vishesh
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20110810/a1d5325b/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the Nepomuk
mailing list