[Nepomuk] Loading Baskets from the command line

[Sebastian Trüg]

On 09/21/2010 12:34 PM, Laura Dragan wrote:
> On Tuesday 21 September 2010 09:30:19 Sebastian Trüg wrote:
>> Hi Amir,
>>
>> looks like I missed this one. So here goes.
>>
>> On 09/14/2010 06:50 PM, Amir Pakdel wrote:
>>> The last prombems were:
>>>
>>>    1.
>>>
>>>       I havd to update Krunner Nepomuk plugin to the last version
>>>
>>>    2.
>>>
>>>       There is a /22rdfsyntaxnsmetadata/ function in /rdf/ which I had
>>>       to comment out
>>
>> Is this something Nepomuk-related? Something that did not work or might
>> need fixing from my part?
>>
>>> I have attached latest version of /src/nepomukintegration.h/ and
>>> /src/nepomukintegration.cpp/ and I would be greateful if you could take
>>> look and inform me of any error, bug or requred features.
>>
>> Some comments:
>> - It is recommended to use KUrl(path) instead of
>>   QUrl::fromLocalFile(path)
>> - setProperty( "a" ) is very very wrong. :) What you want to do is
>>   calling addType()
>> - there is no need to add nfo:FileDataObject type manually. That is
>>   already handled by strigi and Resource. The same goes for nie:url
>> - nfo:fileUrl is deprecated in favor of nie:url.
>> - Please do not use DC. Rather use nie:title.
>> - use setLabel() instead of setProperty( NAO::prefLabel(),
>>
>>> Here is the updated and reformatted testing procedure:
>>
>> I am not sure what to do with the explanations below. Is that for manual
>> testing?
>>
>>
>>> Trüg, do you know why I cannot find tags?
>>> Laura, what metadata do you suggest to add next?
> 
> Hi Amir, 
> 
> There are some things which are not completely clear to me. 
> From what I see in the code, you consider a .basket as a note. 
> I see the basket as a container of multiple notes, each distinct instances of pimo:Note, each with it's own creation/modification times and tags. I'm not sure about the title, as I don't know if you can set the title of an individual note in any other way as through formatting in the text. And then there are the groups of notes, which I think would make sense to capture as RDF as they are structured info as well.
> 
> @nepomuk What vocabulary offers support for this kinds of containers of Things already? 
> As a last resort, you could even make up your own small vocabulary for it.

Well, we do have pimo:isPartOf, right?

Cheers,
Sebastian