[Nepomuk] [Soprano][PATCH] DBusServiceWatcher

[Vishesh Handa]

On Sat, May 29, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Sebastian Trüg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:

> Very nice. But since you are already on it: why not connect to
> serviceUnregistered instead of serviceOwnerChanged?
>
>
Yea. Why didn't I? It's the most obvious thing. Weird.

Can I commit it directly to kdesupport/soprano or will you have to do that?

- Vishesh Handa


> Cheers,
> Sebastian
>
> On 05/29/2010 12:37 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> > The use of old method emits a small warning which had been bugging me.
> >
> > - Vishesh Handa
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Nepomuk mailing list
> > Nepomuk at kde.org
> > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20100529/5ef121fb/attachment.htm 
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: SopranoDBusServiceWatcher.diff
Type: text/x-patch
Size: 3162 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/nepomuk/attachments/20100529/5ef121fb/attachment.diff