[Nepomuk] Need feedback on new query api

[Sebastian Trüg]

On 07/24/2010 11:15 PM, Vishesh Handa wrote:
> It is kinda confusing, but not that much. I think the main problem is
> that it isn't intuitive. 
> 
> One usually expects the *operator==* to be symmetric, and in this case
> it isn't. Moreover spotting bugs would be even harder. Why don't you
> simply overload the *operator !=* ?
> 
> That way I could come up with queries like -
> 
>     (Vocabulary::NAO::numericRating() < RATING ) && (
>     Vocabulary::NAO::hasTag() != TAG )

that I of course did, too.

But I removed the operator version I proposed as I have now 3 voices
against it. :)

Cheers,
Sebastian