[Nepomuk] Nepomuk::Vocabulary ????

[Sebastian Trueg]

I do not have any plans in that direction. So far I thought creating
them on build-time is a better approach.
Why do you think it would be better in a lib?

Cheers,
Sebastian

PierreL wrote:
> Thanks,
> 
> Will  pimo.h or nie.h or nfo.h be included in kdebase/kdelibs some time soon? If not, are there any plans to do so in the future?
> 
> ~Pierre
> 
> 
> 
> --- On Fri, 29/1/10, Sebastian Trueg <trueg at kde.org> wrote:
> 
>> From: Sebastian Trueg <trueg at kde.org>
>> Subject: Re: [Nepomuk] Nepomuk::Vocabulary ????
>> To: "PierreL" <pierrelud at yahoo.com>
>> Cc: Nepomuk at kde.org, nepomuk-kde at semanticdesktop.org
>> Date: Friday, 29 January, 2010, 14:16
>> You generate those files from the
>> ontologies. Have a look at [1] for
>> documentation and [2] for examples.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Sebastian
>>
>> [1]
>> http://soprano.sourceforge.net/apidox/trunk/soprano_howto.html#cmake_magic
>> [2]
>> http://websvn.kde.org/trunk/playground/base/nepomuk-kde/nepomukutils/CMakeLists.txt?view=markup
>>
>> PierreL wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On KDE 4.3.4. Distro is not Mandriva. Trying to use
>> Nepomuk::Vocabulary::PIMO
>>> How and from where would I get the pimo.h file? How
>> would I install this? Where can I find the documentation on
>> this? When will this be included in KDE?
>>> Thanks,
>>> Pierre
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Nepomuk mailing list
>>> Nepomuk at kde.org
>>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/nepomuk
>>>
> 
> 
>       
>