Necessitas is NOT ... (consolidating infrastructure)

[Marco Bernasocchi]

Marco Bernasocchi (mobile)
http:// <http://opengis.ch>opengis.ch
On Mar 17, 2012 9:41 PM, "BogDan" <bog_dan_ro
<bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>@<bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>
yahoo.com <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
>
> [...]
> >>  Nobody wanted to do it! I can't do everything by myself !
> > I can maybe do some of it, but don't we want to move all to
> > http:// <http://community.kde.org/Necessitas>community.kde.org<http://community.kde.org/Necessitas>
/ <http://community.kde.org/Necessitas>Necessitas<http://community.kde.org/Necessitas>and
eventually shut down the sf page?
> >
>
> It's up to you ! The problem is that currently the sf.net home page is
used by too may users to shut down it immediately, also it has an easier
and better bugtracker than KDE and google code, so, IMHO it will be wise to
keep them both and to use sf.net page as primary until we get something
better, but as I said, in the end is up to you !

Ok, then lets stick to SF, and lets try to shut down the other bugtrackers.
Kde bt has only 5 bugs and google has only few more. Is it ok if i
duplicate them to SF?

As well, can i get edit rights for sf? Im mbernasocchi.
>
>
>
> [...]
> >>  - 1 bug tracker on sourceforge and 1 on google code - it was discuss
> >>  many times before, ONLY bug tracker on sourceforge should be used.
> > We could just hide the issue tracker tab at:
> > http:// <http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs>
code.google.com <http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs>
/p/android-lighthouse/<http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs>
adminTabs <http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs>
> >
>
> I know that feature, I didn't had enough time to move the remaining bug
to sf.net ...
>
> >
> > and what about https<https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas>
:// <https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas>
bugs.kde.org<https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas>
/ <https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas>
describecomponents.cgi<https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas>
?product= <https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas>
Necessitas <https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas>
>
> I wanted to use it as primary bugtracker, but is too complicated for
normal users, so I decide to stick with sf.net until we find a better
solution.
>
> [...]
> >>  - The ONLY solution was to "force" contributors to release their
> > code
> >>  under BSD or public domain.
> > So you are saying that using reviewboard is the way to force
contributors to
> > "BSD or public domain" their code so it is "legally"
> > impossible to use pull reguests from gitourious?
>
>
> Sadly, it is legally impossible!. Otherwise we can't upstream it !
>
> I'll try again to convince qt-project to host android qt port on their
servers, this way all these problems will disappear. I hope this time to
have more success.
Super
>
> Cheers,
> BogDan.
Ciao
 On Mar 17, 2012 9:41 PM, "BogDan" <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
>
>
> [...]
> >>  Nobody wanted to do it! I can't do everything by myself !
> > I can maybe do some of it, but don't we want to move all to
> > http://community.kde.org/Necessitas and eventually shut down the sf
> page?
> >
>
> It's up to you ! The problem is that currently the sf.net home page is
> used by too may users to shut down it immediately, also it has an easier
> and better bugtracker than KDE and google code, so, IMHO it will be wise to
> keep them both and to use sf.net page as primary until we get something
> better, but as I said, in the end is up to you !
>
>
>
> [...]
> >>  - 1 bug tracker on sourceforge and 1 on google code - it was discuss
> >>  many times before, ONLY bug tracker on sourceforge should be used.
> > We could just hide the issue tracker tab at:
> > http://code.google.com/p/android-lighthouse/adminTabs
> >
>
> I know that feature, I didn't had enough time to move the remaining bug to
> sf.net ...
>
> >
> > and what about
> https://bugs.kde.org/describecomponents.cgi?product=Necessitas
>
> I wanted to use it as primary bugtracker, but is too complicated for
> normal users, so I decide to stick with sf.net until we find a better
> solution.
>
> [...]
> >>  - The ONLY solution was to "force" contributors to release their
> > code
> >>  under BSD or public domain.
> > So you are saying that using reviewboard is the way to force
> contributors to
> > "BSD or public domain" their code so it is "legally"
> > impossible to use pull reguests from gitourious?
>
>
> Sadly, it is legally impossible!. Otherwise we can't upstream it !
>
> I'll try again to convince qt-project to host android qt port on their
> servers, this way all these problems will disappear. I hope this time to
> have more success.
>
> Cheers,
> BogDan.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/necessitas-devel/attachments/20120317/961ca8a2/attachment-0001.html>