Where are we?

[BogDan]

Hi Chris,

  To be honest I don't know for shore !!! :) 

I'm facing big problems with qt-project foundation/Nokia when it comes to accept work which was contributed by many people, currently I can't merge qt-creator code into upstream because a few people made their contributions with a few patches, even the entire work is under public domain !  A few months ago, they told me to accept only work via gitorious mereg request mechanism, but it seems now is not enough because they changed the damn contributors agreement ... 


  Until they'll make their mind I'm going to accept code only via KDE review board [1] and only if the code is licensed under public domain/ BSD or if the contributor is a KDE developer which has signed the KDE fla [2] I can accept LGPL code as well, otherwise I'm risking to never push my work to upstream.

 
  So, please move your work from gitorious to KDE review board and make sure you specify the license you are releasing  the code (into the patch description or into the file header if your patch have new files) !


Please accept my apologize for any inconvenient ! 


Cheers,
BogDan.

[1] https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/dashboard/

[2] http://ev.kde.org/rules/fla.php

>________________________________
> From: Chris Browet <cbro at semperpax.com>
>To: BogDan <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com> 
>Cc: Harri Pasanen <harri at mpaja.com>; Lauri Laanmets <lauri.laanmets at proekspert.ee>; "necessitas-devel at kde.org" <necessitas-devel at kde.org> 
>Sent: Wednesday, February 8, 2012 9:10 AM
>Subject: Re: Where are we?
> 
>
>Thanks for the clarification, Bogdan.
>Could you just still clarify what the patch submission path should be, please.
>- Chris -
>Le 8 févr. 2012 07:59, "BogDan" <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com> a écrit :
>
>Hello,
>>
>> I hope this [1] link will clarify the repositories dilemma.
>>
>> Regarding lists we have only two, this one which is a low traffic list and  should be used only by necessitas developers and android-qt which is a general proposed lists where people can ask for help.
>>
>> sf.net bug tracking should be used to report any bugs, I didn't had time to move all remaining bug from google page to sf.net and to close it, but if anybody want to do this job, I'll be very happy to give him the rights to sf.net project pages.
>>
>>
>>Regarding the README (also the wiki pages) please understand that I don't have enough time to update them, again, any help is very appreciated !
>>
>>
>>Cheers,
>>BogDan.
>>
>>[1] http://community.kde.org/Necessitas/Repositories
>>
>>>________________________________
>>> From: Chris Browet <cbro at semperpax.com>
>>>To: Lauri Laanmets <lauri.laanmets at proekspert.ee>
>>>Cc: "necessitas-devel at kde.org" <necessitas-devel at kde.org>
>>>Sent: Tuesday, February 7, 2012 5:12 PM
>>>Subject: Re: Where are we?
>>>
>>>
>>>No, you are not stupid ;)
>>>
>>>I myself am quite lost between the multiple repositories, lists and bug trackings...
>>>
>>>- Chris -
>>>
>>>
>>>On Tue, Feb 7, 2012 at 15:33, Lauri Laanmets <lauri.laanmets at proekspert.ee> wrote:
>>>
>>>Hi
>>>>
>>>>Could anybody refresh my memory and tell me what is the main development environment now? I have my Bluetooth code Gitorious and review up at the KDE:
>>>>
>>>>https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/103154/
>>>>
>>>>...that nobody has commented. Everything is lying around at so many places that I'm totally lost. Or am I stupid?
>>>>
>>>>Regards
>>>>Lauri
>>>>_______________________________________________
>>>>Necessitas-devel mailing list
>>>>Necessitas-devel at kde.org
>>>>https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/necessitas-devel
>>>>
>>>
>>>_______________________________________________
>>>Necessitas-devel mailing list
>>>Necessitas-devel at kde.org
>>>https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/necessitas-devel
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>