Assets: Does it need to be transparent?

Willy Gardiol willy at gardiol.org
Mon Apr 2 10:15:23 UTC 2012


I agree!
it's still alpha, and publish was not recomended, so we can still break 
it!


Il 02.04.2012 11:46 Marco Bernasocchi ha scritto:
> And wasnt it explicitly unsuggested to publish on the market exactly
> for those reasons?
>  I guess that better code should be a priority and people can adapt
> their alpha code.
>  Ciao
>
> Marco Bernasocchi (mobile)
>  http:// [3]opengis.ch [4]
> On Apr 2, 2012 11:18 AM, "Harri Pasanen" <harri at mpaja.com [5]> wrote:
>
>> On 04/02/2012 10:42 AM, BogDan wrote:
>>
>>> The problem is that there are some apps on market which will be
>>> break by this change, so we must do the best to ensure backward
>>> compatibility.
>>
>> Do we know how many apps there are in the market made with
>> Necessitas?
>> Is there a way to know?   Like are there analytics at Ministro
>> side?
>>
>> As Necessitas is still officially alpha, it might still be ok to
>> break compatibility.
>>
>> /Harri
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Necessitas-devel mailing list
>> Necessitas-devel at kde.org [1]
>> https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/necessitas-devel [2]
>
>
> Links:
> ------
> [1] mailto:Necessitas-devel at kde.org
> [2] https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/necessitas-devel
> [3] http://opengis.ch
> [4] http://opengis.ch
> [5] mailto:harri at mpaja.com

-- 
Willy Gardiol
willy at gardiol.org
www.gardiol.org
www.trackaway.org -> Track YOUR way the way you want!


More information about the Necessitas-devel mailing list