Anything needed from http://qt-project.org/?

[BogDan]

Hey,

   I think the most important thing for upstreaming is to give us the possibility to use gerrit 

or any other mechanism which will force the contributor to sing the damn Nokia agreement,
is very hard for me to accept patches and then when the time will come to upstream all the 

things to not be able to do it, because I can't find all the contributors, also is even harder 

to do everything by myself.

I think the Qt Foundation should think seriously about it, otherwise it is possible that these 

two projectto remain forever separate...


Cheers,
BogDan.



----- Original Message -----
> From: Espen Riskedal <espen at cutehacks.com>
> To: necessitas-devel at kde.org; BogDan <bog_dan_ro at yahoo.com>; mingw android <mingw.android at gmail.com>
> Cc: 
> Sent: Tuesday, November 29, 2011 9:30 AM
> Subject: Anything needed from http://qt-project.org/?
> 
>T omorrow at the Qt Contributors Day in San Fransisco there will be a
> small session where the needs of Qt for Android and Qt for iOS ports
> are discussed. See:
> http://wiki.qt-project.org/Qt_Contributors_Day#Draft_schedule
> 
> "The Android and iOS ports
> What is the desired relationship between the Qt ports for Android and
> iOS and the Qt Project? Any needs in terms of infrastructure and
> processes? Participation confirmed from Cutehacks (some of the
> promoters of the Android port) and Ian Dean (main developer of the iOS
> port). "
> 
> So, anything process/hardware/software wise that could help the
> project with upstreaming and maintaining the port?
> 
> All I can think of is:
> - proper documentation for setup of running autotests
> - central place to upload test reports (so we can compare results)
> - way to include android as one of the platforms being automatically
> built by the integration system
> 
> Other things could be:
> - adding android as a platform in jira/bugreport system of qt? (don't
> know if wanted)
> 
> If you give me some comments I can raise them there.
> 
> espen
>