[Marble-devel] Review Request: Caching The Atmosphere

[Illya Kovalevskyy]

> On Dec. 5, 2012, 8:22 a.m., René Küttner wrote:
> > src/plugins/render/atmosphere/AtmospherePlugin.cpp, line 139
> > <http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107581/diff/2/?file=97196#file97196line139>
> >
> >     Should'nt we check for a changed atmosphere-color (or a new planet) too?
> 
> Torsten Rahn wrote:
>     Ooooops, yes, good catch! 
>     
>     (but to my excuse it was 5 o'clock in the morning, when I missed this during the review ... ;-))))
>     
>     I guess at the current point Illya would need to check for the planet to avoid dependencies on other gci-patches ?!?!?
>     
>     Illya: can you add this check?

I will.


- Illya


-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107581/#review23013
-----------------------------------------------------------


On Dec. 5, 2012, 4:55 a.m., Illya Kovalevskyy wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107581/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Dec. 5, 2012, 4:55 a.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Marble.
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> I tried to increase performance with caching the atmosphere into QPixmap.
> Task on GCI: http://www.google-melange.com/gci/task/view/google/gci2012/7989206
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   src/plugins/render/atmosphere/AtmospherePlugin.h d662509 
>   src/plugins/render/atmosphere/AtmospherePlugin.cpp e6b531f 
> 
> Diff: http://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/107581/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Successfully built on Ubuntu Linux 12.10 (Intel)
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Illya Kovalevskyy
> 
>

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/marble-devel/attachments/20121205/602e5188/attachment.html>