kate lsp client plugin

[Dominik Haumann]

Hi Mark,

the current version does not work anymore for me. Is there anything that I
need to pay attention to?

The symbols sidebar still works, but all other actions that operate on the
current cursor position just result in a Message in the bottom right corner.

Best regards
Dominik

Mark Nauwelaerts <mark.nauwelaerts at gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 10. Juli
2019, 19:04:

> On 10/07/19 16:28, Christoph Cullmann wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >> Interesting ...  at present the "servermanager" sends a (meaningless)
> >> document revision-id to the server, but it may well send a revision
> >> obtained from MovingInterface (and lock as well). Some simple RAII
> >> wrapper (with shared semantics) can be made for a "locked revision"
> >> and a collection of those (for current known/tracked documents)
> >> returned from servermananger to caller (when requesting a document
> >> sync/update to the server).  That (RAII) collection can then be
> >> captured into the lambda (if so deemed desired/useful by caller) so
> >> that the (old) revision is available for translation to current(cursor
> >> positions) when processing response.  Shared RAII will then release as
> >> and when ok by all holders.
> >>
> >> In case of symbolview, that is probably not needed, since the outline
> >> is a "moving target" anyway when typing frantically and will update
> >> (accurately) to latest state when typing seizes.
> >
> > Hmm, I think for the symbol view it would be not that bad, given at
> least
> > normally
> > it will perfectly fine translate the line moves and you don't need to
> trigger
> > reparsing
> > that often at all. But it is nothing critical.
> >
> >>
> >> However, it is as noted useful for well-aimed highlighting, and also
> >> when the time comes for processing server TextEdits (e.g. formatting).
> >
> > Yes, for that it would be much more important.
> >
> > Dominik linked you some pull requests for some smaller changes, you
> could take
> > a look at that.
> >
> > If you have some further changes, it would be cool if you can push them,
> > I want to take a look if I could improve the highlight further ;=)
> >
> > Greetings
> > Christoph
> >
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Mark
> >
> Ok, I pushed all I have here (specifically the highlight stuff).
>
> I had a look at those requests and accepted them, which turned into
> Approved for
> one of them, but not so for the other (in a more confused state?).  I
> assume the
> actual landing is then done by back-end and/or submitting author?
>
> Regards,
> Mark.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kwrite-devel/attachments/20190711/0f1fa8fc/attachment.html>