Rust Completion Plugin
Eike Hein
hein at kde.org
Wed Aug 21 21:20:07 BST 2019
Hi Dominik,
I would support this - my plugin is based on racer, and the language server protocol and RLS were basically born to do one better. racer is used in RLS. It's the right way to go as far as I'm concerned. Quite happy the LPS plugin happened :)
I'd even accept a hard handover without a grace period; the plugin probably doesn't see a lot of use at this point, and racer users can migrate to RLS.
Cheers,
Eike
On August 22, 2019 4:21:03 AM GMT+09:00, Dominik Haumann <dhaumann at kde.org> wrote:
>Hi Eike and everyone,
>
>since 2015 Kate got the rustcompletion plugin:
>https://invent.kde.org/kde/kate/commits/master/addons/rustcompletion
>
>Recently, the lsp plugin was added with Rust support:
>-
>https://kate-editor.org/post/2019-08-07-kate-initial-rust-lsp-support/
>-
>https://kate-editor.org/post/2019/2019-08-10-kate-lsp-more-languages-supported/
>
>Eike, would it make sense to remove your plugin in favor of the lsp
>plugin?
>As far as I understand, the rustcompletion plugin "just" supports code
>completion and goto definition. The LPS plugin supports this as well
>and
>likely more.
>
>Maybe we should have a smooth migration path: For the 19.12 release,
>still
>ship both plugins, but for 20.04 drop the rustcompletion plugin.
>
>Maybe something we can discuss at Akademy. Thoughts?
>
>Best regards
>Dominik
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kwrite-devel/attachments/20190822/2dde0c47/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the KWrite-Devel
mailing list