Syntax Highlighting / Shebang?
hyper_ch
kwrite-devel at sjau.ch
Wed Oct 25 10:23:54 UTC 2017
Hi there
New to the list bug long-time kate user. In #bash on freenode they
recommend to not use a file extension for bash scripts giving this reason:
<greybot> Don't use extensions for your scripts. Scripts define new
commands that you can run, and commands are generally not given
extensions. Do you run ls.elf? Also: bash scripts are *not* sh scripts
(so don't use .sh) and the extension will only cause dependencies
headaches if the script gets rewritten in another language. See
http://www.talisman.org/~erlkonig/documents/commandname-extensions-considered-harmful
However due to syntax highlighting I'm accustomed to just adding .sh to
scripts but lately I less and less do so - up to now it meant that Kate
didn't do any syntax highlighting automagically so I asked today if it
could be done by analyzing the shebang line.
The response I was given was to add modelines like:
# kate: syntax bash
and that really works well.
However it's another line and some might consider it not as pretty. For
that reason I've been wondering if syntax detection could be based on
the shebang line?
hyper_ch
More information about the KWrite-Devel
mailing list