[Kwintv] Small kwintv3 patch

[Michael Kedl]

On Thu, 2002-10-17 at 10:57, George Staikos wrote:
> On Thursday October 17 2002 05:21, Rizsanyi Zsolt wrote:
> > And changing to channel 13 is different than changing to 14 if your max
> > channel is 135 :)
> >
> > And I dont think it is a problem, because if you want to change channel 5
> > you press it and wait. If you want to change to channel 6 you press it and
> > wait (and you realize, that you dont have to wait, but you get directly
> > what you need :)
> > If you want channel 50 you press 50 and you get your channel :)
> > And if you want channel 60 then you will get channel 6 because there is no
> > channel 60 :)
> >
> > So in every cases the user gets what he wants, just sometimes he get a
> > bonus (meaning he doesn't have to wait), except in the last case, but then
> > there is no such channel, so he can't get what he wants :)
> 
>   I can understand your argument.  I understand mine too.  Just different 
> semantics.  You're right, there is no need to delay.  However, I feel that it 
> should be consistent there (always the same delay for the channels with n 
> digits).  What do other people think?  Can we come to a bit of a concensus on 
> this?
> 
I would definitely prefer to eliminate the delay whenever possible.
I know that can make it inconsistent sometimes, but in the best way
possible.  Better than pressing 7 and having to wait for no "good"
reason because I only have 60 channels.


> -- 
> 
> George Staikos
> 
> _______________________________________________
> kwintv mailing list
> kwintv@mail.kde.org
> http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kwintv
>