D29459: client.activities write access

[Vlad Zahorodnii]

zzag requested changes to this revision.
zzag added a comment.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.


  The Toplevel class contains mostly read-only properties (I wonder whether it's actually worth to put properties in the Toplevel class since Deleted windows are not exposed to scripting). Could you please put `Q_PROPERTY(QStringList activities READ activities WRITE setOnActivities NOTIFY activitiesChanged)` in the AbstractClient class instead?

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D29459

To: tcorreabr, #kwin, zzag
Cc: zzag, kwin, Orage, cacarry, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, mkulinski, ragreen, jackyalcine, iodelay, crozbo, bwowk, ZrenBot, ngraham, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, romangg, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kwin/attachments/20200506/09891c6f/attachment.html>