D27439: Replaced isDock check with !hasDecoration

[Niccolò Venerandi]

niccolove added a comment.


  In D27439#612621 <https://phabricator.kde.org/D27439#612621>, @davidedmundson wrote:
  
  > We need to find something more reliable than noDecoration, that includes so many other things.
  
  
  Do you have any tip on what could be more reliable?
  
  @zzag wrote:
  
  > Using EffectWindow::noDecoration() instead of EffectWindow::isDock() doesn't seem right. I suggest to try to tackle the problem at its root. The issue is that the blur effect doesn't sample texels strictly below the window.
  
  
  I'm afraid that I don't understand what you mean with "the blur effect doesn't sample texels strictly below the window".

REPOSITORY
  R108 KWin

REVISION DETAIL
  https://phabricator.kde.org/D27439

To: niccolove, #kwin, zzag, davidedmundson
Cc: davidedmundson, ngraham, kwin, Orage, LeGast00n, The-Feren-OS-Dev, cblack, jraleigh, zachus, fbampaloukas, GB_2, mkulinski, ragreen, jackyalcine, iodelay, crozbo, bwowk, ZrenBot, alexeymin, himcesjf, lesliezhai, ali-mohamed, hardening, romangg, jensreuterberg, abetts, sebas, apol, ahiemstra, mart
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.kde.org/pipermail/kwin/attachments/20200217/a6cf3926/attachment.html>